But what really catches the eye is the following passage:
"Now we get to the Plats du Jour and general impressions of existing menus.
Here there is confusion and incoherence. Rothschild, Versailles, Edwardian-style grandeur, Maxim’s Belle Epoque manner plus Raymond Oliver’s style pompier have gone into this pot along with currently smart fads and fancies. Picking from a handful of sample menus I find the following company:
Duc de Chartres, royal prince;
Rothschild;
Caruso;
Henri IV;
A cardinal, anonymous;
Waleska, an Emperor’s mistress;
Arnold Bennett;
A marshal, anonymous;
Marie-Térèse, an empress;
Romanoff, an Imperial house;
Colbert, an admiral
Plus some nebulous Dianes, Suzettes, Vefour and Chateaubriant (the “t” is wrong, whatever any pedant may say. It’s like insisting on calling lobster américaine armoricaine) plus some place names such as Albufera, Clamart, Nantua, which have meaning only for those who spend their lives reading Escoffier and the Larousse Gastronomique. (Monte Carlo and Vichy do, I suppose, mean something.)
While I don’t know how much these exalted names mean to Annabel’s customers, either as personages or as associated with particular dishes of a rather grandiose nature (exceptions are Arnold Bennett and Colbert), the overall impression created by the menus is one of somewhat formidably ambitious and expensive cooking."
Which, one might have thought, was precisely the point.
No comments:
Post a Comment